Responsible New York supports the Public Higher Education Empowerment and Innovation Act proposed by Governor Paterson.  This legislation will provide the State University of New York (SUNY) and the City University of New York (CUNY) with greater operational independence through measures that will eliminate burdensome overregulations on contracting, procurement, land use, and other areas.  The legislation will also put a rational tuition policy in place where SUNY and CUNY trustees may implement a “fair, equitable and responsible tuition policy that would provide the universities with the discretion to raise tuition incrementally up to an annual cap of two and one half times the five-year rolling average.”

These landmark reforms would essentially remove the micromanaging done by Albany and provide more independence to SUNY and CUNY so they may adapt in this ever-changing and competitive economy. 

We support this piece of legislation and urge the Senate and Assembly to pass the bill during the 2010 Session.  Reforms such as fostering public-private research and partnerships will help New York’s future and aid in propelling the economy forward. 

According to Paterson, these reforms will “create more than 2,200 faculty positions, 7,000 staff positions, and 43,000 construction jobs on SUNY university and medical centers.”

Legislation such as this will improve the economic well-being of the state and we need more of it.

Governor Paterson’s press release is available at: www.ny.gov/governor/press/press_01151001.html

Upstate New York pays the highest property taxes in the county. That’s not news to any of us who pay taxes here.

The surprise is that our property taxes are significantly—and disproportionately—higher than those paid by in other parts of the state.

As a result, the price we pay goes beyond the dollars and cents and hurts our communities, our families and our economy.

According to the New York State Comptroller’s Office, property taxes on a home in Rochester valued at $100,000 are just under $4,000. Taxes on a $100,000 home in Yonkers (Westchester County) are less than half that ($1,773) while in South Hampton (Suffolk County) they are almost a tenth of that ($456).

The result is a competitive disadvantage or a “property tax surcharge” felt in every part of our lives:

• Community: The exorbitant taxes discourage homeownership, one of the keys to a successful and stable community.

• Seniors: High property taxes make it hard—and too often impossible—for people on fixed incomes, like many seniors, to stay in their homes.

• Economy: To business leaders our property tax burden is like a big red sign that proclaims: Go Away! Consider a large company in the service industry considering relocating. They calculate the cost to live for themselves and their employees and are forced to look elsewhere. Or a large manufacturing company. They add up the taxes on the headquarters, the manufacturing plant, the warehouses, parking lots and so on and the property taxes on all that land too often sends them elsewhere.

The most insidious part is that high property taxes contribute to a never ending cycle: as the taxes go up, property values go down. As property values go down local governments raise property taxes to maintain revenue. As taxes go up . . .

Unfortunately, as you know all too well, our staggering property tax burden is on top of an already high personal income tax and some of the highest sales taxes in the nation.

Identifying the problems high property taxes cause, and this striking upstate/downstate disparity, is only the first step. The problem has many causes and has been years in the making and, candidly, may take years to solve.

I hope you have signed our petition demanding relief.  Please join our discussion on how to solve this problem by telling us what you think. Excelsior!

[Originally appeared in Rochester Democrat & Chronicle, February 8, 2009]